Hawaï sur Seine
Cité Debergue behind the "rue du rendez-vous" 11e arr. Paris (demolition permit obtained in 2004...)
18.5.06
Plate tectonics : Stanley Miller, Claude Alègre, haroun tazieff 1/2
Binary weapons
- I'll give you ten pounds. - Is that true ? - You know, ducks don't speek english correctly.
- I'll give you ten pounds. - Is that true ? - You know, ducks don't speek english correctly.It's no longer an edged origami paper tiger, but it suddenly sounds like what we are all facing in our lives. When there are no longer clear solutions, feelings are twisting around your logic and you no longer know how it works. You need to put on your empathy gloves and to scour in the belly of someone else…
For a scientist, logic + feelings = soup. No more distance, the impossibility of being phlegmatic and convincing at the same time… Add mysticism to it and I’ll finish my article describing how the beer barrel should be choosen for the “Walpurgis Nacht” in Bayern.
Geologists used to call the first form of the Earth the primitive Soup. From it, immerged the first proteins. Some fools like Claude Alègre believe their components (amino acids) came from asteroids at the same times as skinny mammoths. The other part of the Polish geologists (in fact it's Stanley J. Miller in 53...) demonstrate it was perfectly possible to create these components using the primitive soup under some contingent conditions : very high pressure, a very low pH and a consequent number of electric discharges of some millions of Volts. The anaerobic mammoths are the only ones who know what part of these Astro-geologists is personifying the primitive soup. A complement in french
Following the assessment of the polished Miller, I would propose a protocol to bolt scientists suffering from feelings aggressions. It could have tremendous effects on their decision process : they would learn, not the "how" some humanbeings dare taking decisions, but simply that a "why" is existing and it's not purely logic. But please, try to disuade them from finding the "why" which would be the first thing they would do, like a 2 years old child which would systematically grab the stick you hang at 30 cm of his eyes.
For a scientist, logic + feelings = soup. No more distance, the impossibility of being phlegmatic and convincing at the same time… Add mysticism to it and I’ll finish my article describing how the beer barrel should be choosen for the “Walpurgis Nacht” in Bayern.
Geologists used to call the first form of the Earth the primitive Soup. From it, immerged the first proteins. Some fools like Claude Alègre believe their components (amino acids) came from asteroids at the same times as skinny mammoths. The other part of the Polish geologists (in fact it's Stanley J. Miller in 53...) demonstrate it was perfectly possible to create these components using the primitive soup under some contingent conditions : very high pressure, a very low pH and a consequent number of electric discharges of some millions of Volts. The anaerobic mammoths are the only ones who know what part of these Astro-geologists is personifying the primitive soup. A complement in french
Following the assessment of the polished Miller, I would propose a protocol to bolt scientists suffering from feelings aggressions. It could have tremendous effects on their decision process : they would learn, not the "how" some humanbeings dare taking decisions, but simply that a "why" is existing and it's not purely logic. But please, try to disuade them from finding the "why" which would be the first thing they would do, like a 2 years old child which would systematically grab the stick you hang at 30 cm of his eyes.
The end of the world in kit
This is the end, the only end my friend and all the children are insane, the end
- During the XVII th century, a monk said that the world was created the 23rd October 4004 BC at 9 AM
- At the following URL you will find a selection of advertising of Grumly
- Watch these videos, then combine point 1. and 2. and you'd be able to determine the day of the end of the world.
Bukovski was not drunk a single time after the end of his life
French condom v.s. Capote anglaise
Truman Capote.
Chronologically :
homosexual,
egocentric,
depressive,
extravagant,
famous writer,
alcoholism.
Actually, Charles Bukowski was just a simpler Truman Capote. His path through life was one step shorter.
Chronologically :
homosexual,
egocentric,
depressive,
extravagant,
famous writer,
alcoholism.
Actually, Charles Bukowski was just a simpler Truman Capote. His path through life was one step shorter.
To waste is productive
My bunny habit
I've taken the habit to think about writing something every day. Every day I did think about it.
The problem is to find a keyboard and ten minutes at this very time... I mean “this one”; not the following one which is now “this one”. That's one of the reason why the output of this sum of thought words is quasi null : there is not way out… It's like a book read with too much haste. On one hand there is a instantaneous output whose quality depends on the quality of the book : this one is called pleasure. The words responsible for it stay in memory because these point at feelings. On the other hand there is what stays between all these small islands of pleasure : what is left, most of the sweat of the author ; just for nothing ?
It's a kind of mount of waste upon which the moving thought can stand, still. The same analogy appears between the scientific publications and the effective progress of researches. The former being the mountain, the latter the chap upon it.
This is one way of conceiving the use of the needlessness productions when one steers toward a useful goal.
The problem is to find a keyboard and ten minutes at this very time... I mean “this one”; not the following one which is now “this one”. That's one of the reason why the output of this sum of thought words is quasi null : there is not way out… It's like a book read with too much haste. On one hand there is a instantaneous output whose quality depends on the quality of the book : this one is called pleasure. The words responsible for it stay in memory because these point at feelings. On the other hand there is what stays between all these small islands of pleasure : what is left, most of the sweat of the author ; just for nothing ?
It's a kind of mount of waste upon which the moving thought can stand, still. The same analogy appears between the scientific publications and the effective progress of researches. The former being the mountain, the latter the chap upon it.
This is one way of conceiving the use of the needlessness productions when one steers toward a useful goal.
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
